Home/Case Law/Raines v. Shoney's, Inc.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionMemorandum and Order on Summary Judgment

Raines v. Shoney's, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

This memorandum addresses motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Shoney’s, Inc., Jess Shearin d/b/a Shearin Foods, and Angie Pelham in a lawsuit brought by employees of a Shoney's restaurant in Kimball, Tennessee. Plaintiffs sought damages for alleged wrongful acts, including forced searches, stemming from a missing cash incident on May 23, 1993. The Court granted summary judgment for Shoney's and Shearin on all claims, citing lack of agency for Shoney's and no respondeat superior liability for Shearin on most claims. However, Angie Pelham's motion for summary judgment was granted in part and denied in part, allowing claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, and Donna Raines's specific assault and battery claims against her to proceed to trial. All other claims against Pelham, including those under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 and the Tennessee Human Rights Act, were dismissed due to insufficient evidence of class-based animus or discriminatory intent.

Raines v. Shoney's, Inc. is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, E.D. Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This memorandum addresses motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Shoney’s, Inc., Jess Shearin d/b/a Shearin Foods, and Angie Pelham in a lawsuit brought by employees of a Shoney's restaurant in Kimball, Tennessee. Plaintiffs sought damages for alleged wrongful acts, including forced searches, stemming from a missing cash incident on May 23, 1993. The Court granted summary judgment for Shoney's and Shearin on all claims, citing lack of agency for Shoney's and no respondeat superior liability for Shearin on most claims. However, Angie Pelham's motion for summary judgment was granted in part and denied in part, allowing claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, and Donna Raines's specific assault and battery claims against her to proceed to trial. All other claims against Pelham, including those under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 and the Tennessee Human Rights Act, were dismissed due to insufficient evidence of class-based animus or discriminatory intent.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Raines v. Shoney's, Inc. workers compensation case in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Raines v. Shoney's, Inc. case law summary from District Court, E.D. Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Raines v. Shoney's, Inc. Case Analysis

Raines v. Shoney's, Inc. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.