Home/Case Law/QUENTIN FORD vs. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

QUENTIN FORD vs. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Nov 14, 2008
San Francisco
ADJ1144741

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision that applicant Quentin Ford is not entitled to treat outside of the defendant's Medical Provider Network (MPN). The Board found Dr. Joel's report inadmissible due to its timing and lack of explanation for its late submission. Furthermore, even if admitted, the report did not establish applicant's need to continue treatment with Dr. Joel outside the MPN, as the recommended treatment had been completed and no subsequent treatment plan was outlined.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision that applicant Quentin Ford is not entitled to treat outside of the defendant's Medical Provider Network (MPN). The Board found Dr. Joel's report inadmissible due to its timing and lack of explanation for its late submission. Furthermore, even if admitted, the report did not establish applicant's need to continue treatment with Dr. Joel outside the MPN, as the recommended treatment had been completed and no subsequent treatment plan was outlined.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

QUENTIN FORD vs. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox