CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because the WCJ's order directing a re-evaluation with a qualified medical examiner and an interpreter was an interlocutory procedural order, not a final determination of substantive rights or liabilities. As such, it was not subject to reconsideration under Labor Code section 5900. The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's report recommending dismissal of the petition.
PHAN TIEU vs. ALBERTSONS, SPECIALTY RISK SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because the WCJ's order directing a re-evaluation with a qualified medical examiner and an interpreter was an interlocutory procedural order, not a final determination of substantive rights or liabilities. As such, it was not subject to reconsideration under Labor Code section 5900. The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's report recommending dismissal of the petition.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.