CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a workers' compensation applicant seeking reconsideration of a finding of no industrial injury. The applicant argued that causation was not an issue and that psychiatric injury rules were not properly considered, also challenging the Agreed Medical Examiner's (AME) report. The Board denied reconsideration, finding that industrial causation was consistently disputed by the defendant. The applicant failed to provide substantial medical evidence to support industrial injury claims, while the AME's report was deemed substantial and supported the finding of no industrial injury.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a workers' compensation applicant seeking reconsideration of a finding of no industrial injury. The applicant argued that causation was not an issue and that psychiatric injury rules were not properly considered, also challenging the Agreed Medical Examiner's (AME) report. The Board denied reconsideration, finding that industrial causation was consistently disputed by the defendant. The applicant failed to provide substantial medical evidence to support industrial injury claims, while the AME's report was deemed substantial and supported the finding of no industrial injury.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.