Home/Case Law/PAULA CANO vs. RANDSTAD NORTH AMERICA, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE
Regular Decision

PAULA CANO vs. RANDSTAD NORTH AMERICA, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE

Filed: Jun 13, 2016
Oakland
ADJ9824775, ADJ9821647

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed an applicant's Petition for Reconsideration. The dismissal was based on the reasons outlined in the Workers' Compensation Judge's (WCJ) report, which the WCAB adopted. The WCAB noted an administrative error where the applicant, Paula Cano, was referred to as "he" in the WCJ's report, acknowledging she is female. The case is now returned to the WCJ for further proceedings concerning a medical group's lien.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed an applicant's Petition for Reconsideration. The dismissal was based on the reasons outlined in the Workers' Compensation Judge's (WCJ) report, which the WCAB adopted. The WCAB noted an administrative error where the applicant, Paula Cano, was referred to as "he" in the WCJ's report, acknowledging she is female. The case is now returned to the WCJ for further proceedings concerning a medical group's lien.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

PAULA CANO vs. RANDSTAD NORTH AMERICA, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE (2016) – Oakland | CompFox