Home/Case Law/PAUL MACIAS vs. CENTRAL GARDEN AND PET, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular Decision

PAUL MACIAS vs. CENTRAL GARDEN AND PET, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Jan 27, 2016
San Francisco
ADJ379810 (LAO 0864253) ADJ1253050 (LAO 0864252)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition because it was not filed from a "final" order, as required by law. The WCJ's decision addressed only an intermediate procedural or evidentiary issue, not a substantive right, liability, or threshold matter. Therefore, the petition was dismissed as procedurally improper.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition because it was not filed from a "final" order, as required by law. The WCJ's decision addressed only an intermediate procedural or evidentiary issue, not a substantive right, liability, or threshold matter. Therefore, the petition was dismissed as procedurally improper.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

PAUL MACIAS vs. CENTRAL GARDEN AND PET, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY (2016) – San Francisco | CompFox