CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to applicant Paul Liggammari's petition challenging a prior award. Applicant disputed his weekly earnings calculation, the VRMA start date, and the denial of penalties and interest. The Board rescinded the original award and returned the case to the trial level. This action was also taken to allow consideration of relevant en banc decisions concerning the WCJ's jurisdiction over VRMA after the repeal of Labor Code Section 139.5. The Board encouraged the parties to seek informal resolution of the disputed issues.
PAUL LIGAMMARI vs. LOS ANGELES COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE, ESIS is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to applicant Paul Liggammari's petition challenging a prior award. Applicant disputed his weekly earnings calculation, the VRMA start date, and the denial of penalties and interest. The Board rescinded the original award and returned the case to the trial level. This action was also taken to allow consideration of relevant en banc decisions concerning the WCJ's jurisdiction over VRMA after the repeal of Labor Code Section 139.5. The Board encouraged the parties to seek informal resolution of the disputed issues.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.