Home/Case Law/PAUL CRUM vs. CITY OF OAKLAND, JT2 INTEGRATED SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

PAUL CRUM vs. CITY OF OAKLAND, JT2 INTEGRATED SERVICES

Filed: Apr 14, 2008
OAK 0314655, OAK 0314656

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of an award requiring the defendant to provide a larger city vehicle, finding the medical report supporting this accommodation lacked sufficient specificity. The WCAB rescinded the award and returned the matter for further development of the medical record. This was due to the vagueness of the Qualified Medical Evaluator's recommendation regarding a "larger vehicle" and the need for clearer reasoning and specificity on what constitutes an appropriate accommodation.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of an award requiring the defendant to provide a larger city vehicle, finding the medical report supporting this accommodation lacked sufficient specificity. The WCAB rescinded the award and returned the matter for further development of the medical record. This was due to the vagueness of the Qualified Medical Evaluator's recommendation regarding a "larger vehicle" and the need for clearer reasoning and specificity on what constitutes an appropriate accommodation.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

PAUL CRUM vs. CITY OF OAKLAND, JT2 INTEGRATED SERVICES (2008) – | CompFox