Home/Case Law/PATRICK TERRY (Dec'd), WENDY TERRY (Widow) vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

PATRICK TERRY (Dec'd), WENDY TERRY (Widow) vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Dec 08, 2017
Eureka
ADJ10649068

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a widow's claim for death benefits after her husband died from an injury that contributed to his death. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's finding that the claim was barred by Labor Code section 5406(b). This statute prohibits death benefit claims filed more than 240 weeks from the date of injury. The Board clarified that for a specific injury, the date of injury is fixed and cannot be extended to the date of death, even if death is a consequence of that injury. Therefore, the widow's claim was dismissed because it was filed beyond the 240-week statutory limit.

PATRICK TERRY (Dec'd), WENDY TERRY (Widow) vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Eureka. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Eureka.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a widow's claim for death benefits after her husband died from an injury that contributed to his death. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's finding that the claim was barred by Labor Code section 5406(b). This statute prohibits death benefit claims filed more than 240 weeks from the "date of injury." The Board clarified that for a specific injury, the date of injury is fixed and cannot be extended to the date of death, even if death is a consequence of that injury. Therefore, the widow's claim was dismissed because it was filed beyond the 240-week statutory limit.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

PATRICK TERRY (Dec'd), WENDY TERRY (Widow) vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in Eureka. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

PATRICK TERRY (Dec'd), WENDY TERRY (Widow) vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from Eureka. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

PATRICK TERRY (Dec'd), WENDY TERRY (Widow) vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

PATRICK TERRY (Dec'd), WENDY TERRY (Widow) vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Eureka. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.