CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinding the lower judge's order that applicant was entitled to vocational rehabilitation maintenance allowance (VRMA) at the legal rate without offset for earnings. The Board remanded the case for recalculation of VRMA considering applicant's earnings during the relevant period, noting the legal rate was not sufficiently defined and that applicant's employment income necessitated a wage loss calculation. The Board also vacated the penalty and attorney fees awarded due to the dispute over VRMA calculation.
PATRICK METOYER vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinding the lower judge's order that applicant was entitled to vocational rehabilitation maintenance allowance (VRMA) at the "legal rate" without offset for earnings. The Board remanded the case for recalculation of VRMA considering applicant's earnings during the relevant period, noting the "legal rate" was not sufficiently defined and that applicant's employment income necessitated a wage loss calculation. The Board also vacated the penalty and attorney fees awarded due to the dispute over VRMA calculation.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.