CompFox AI Summary
This case involves an applicant seeking reconsideration of an order that allowed the defendant, Cleveland Browns Football Company, LLC, to potentially introduce video evidence. The original administrative law judge excluded the video as untimely disclosed, citing Labor Code section 5502(d)(3), which generally closes discovery at mandatory settlement conferences. The Appeals Board initially granted removal to review the exclusion, finding the video potentially relevant. However, the Board now denies reconsideration because the prior order was interlocutory and not a final determination of rights or liability.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves an applicant seeking reconsideration of an order that allowed the defendant, Cleveland Browns Football Company, LLC, to potentially introduce video evidence. The original administrative law judge excluded the video as untimely disclosed, citing Labor Code section 5502(d)(3), which generally closes discovery at mandatory settlement conferences. The Appeals Board initially granted removal to review the exclusion, finding the video potentially relevant. However, the Board now denies reconsideration because the prior order was interlocutory and not a final determination of rights or liability.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.