Home/Case Law/PATRICIA L. THOMPSON vs. ACOSTA SALES AND MARKETING, ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

PATRICIA L. THOMPSON vs. ACOSTA SALES AND MARKETING, ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE

Filed: Jul 10, 2007
San Francisco
AHM 095279

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board reversed the WCJ's finding that the applicant's psychiatric injury was barred by Labor Code section 3208.3(d), determining it resulted from a "sudden and extraordinary employment condition" (a severe car accident). However, they affirmed the WCJ's award of medical treatment for the psychiatric condition, as it was deemed necessary to cure or relieve the effects of the applicant's orthopedic injuries sustained in the same incident. The Board concluded that psychiatric treatment was reasonably required for the industrial orthopedic injuries, particularly due to a chronic pain disorder.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board reversed the WCJ's finding that the applicant's psychiatric injury was barred by Labor Code section 3208.3(d), determining it resulted from a "sudden and extraordinary employment condition" (a severe car accident). However, they affirmed the WCJ's award of medical treatment for the psychiatric condition, as it was deemed necessary to cure or relieve the effects of the applicant's orthopedic injuries sustained in the same incident. The Board concluded that psychiatric treatment was reasonably required for the industrial orthopedic injuries, particularly due to a chronic pain disorder.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

PATRICIA L. THOMPSON vs. ACOSTA SALES AND MARKETING, ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE (2007) – San Francisco | CompFox