CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding that the applicant's right knee injury did not have an indicated permanent disability in 2004 based on treating physician reports, thus requiring the use of the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule. The majority concluded that Dr. Lim's MRI report, while showing tears, did not explicitly state the existence of permanent disability from the industrial injury, and the treating physician's report at the time showed no physical evidence of permanent impairment. A dissenting opinion argued that Dr. Lim's MRI report, supported by subsequent medical findings and the applicant's ongoing restrictions, indicated permanent disability in 2004, warranting application of the older 1997 rating schedule.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding that the applicant's right knee injury did not have an indicated permanent disability in 2004 based on treating physician reports, thus requiring the use of the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule. The majority concluded that Dr. Lim's MRI report, while showing tears, did not explicitly state the existence of permanent disability from the industrial injury, and the treating physician's report at the time showed no physical evidence of permanent impairment. A dissenting opinion argued that Dr. Lim's MRI report, supported by subsequent medical findings and the applicant's ongoing restrictions, indicated permanent disability in 2004, warranting application of the older 1997 rating schedule.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.