Home/Case Law/PARVIZ AREFIAN vs. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., OLD REPUBLIC as administered by BROADSPIRE
Regular DecisionReconsideration/Removal

PARVIZ AREFIAN vs. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., OLD REPUBLIC as administered by BROADSPIRE

Filed: Apr 15, 2019
Van Nuys
ADJ11323347

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Uber's petition for reconsideration because the WCJ's order denying their petition to dismiss was not a final order. The WCAB also denied Uber's petition for removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board held that due process requires a hearing on the merits of the dismissal petition, not premature appellate review. Therefore, the dismissal petition must be litigated at the trial level.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Uber's petition for reconsideration because the WCJ's order denying their petition to dismiss was not a final order. The WCAB also denied Uber's petition for removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board held that due process requires a hearing on the merits of the dismissal petition, not premature appellate review. Therefore, the dismissal petition must be litigated at the trial level.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

PARVIZ AREFIAN vs. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., OLD REPUBLIC as administered by BROADSPIRE (2019) – Van Nuys | CompFox