Home/Case Law/PAMELA ZEILSTRA vs. TARGET STORES, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CMS
Regular DecisionReconsideration

PAMELA ZEILSTRA vs. TARGET STORES, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CMS

Filed: Aug 15, 2014
Oakland
ADJ1332416 (WCK 0031685)

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a second Petition for Reconsideration filed by applicant Pamela Zeilstra challenging prior orders and the Appeals Board's own prior decision. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition because it was a successive filing after a previous petition had already been denied. The Board clarified that once a petition for reconsideration is denied or dismissed, the proper recourse is a writ of review, not another petition. Applicant's subsequent answer was also rejected as procedurally improper.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a second Petition for Reconsideration filed by applicant Pamela Zeilstra challenging prior orders and the Appeals Board's own prior decision. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition because it was a successive filing after a previous petition had already been denied. The Board clarified that once a petition for reconsideration is denied or dismissed, the proper recourse is a writ of review, not another petition. Applicant's subsequent answer was also rejected as procedurally improper.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

PAMELA ZEILSTRA vs. TARGET STORES, permissibly self-insured, administered by SEDGWICK CMS (2014) – Oakland | CompFox