CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding an attorney's fee award. The defendant incorrectly claimed the issue of fees was not raised and that they were aggrieved by the award. The Board found the defendant was not aggrieved, as fees were payable from the applicant's benefits, and the issue was properly noted in the pre-trial statement. Consequently, the Board issued a notice of intention to impose sanctions on the defendant's counsel for filing a frivolous petition.
PAMELA VAN ZANDT vs. NIKE, INC COLE-HAAN, OLD REPUBLIC ADMINISTERED BY ESIS is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding an attorney's fee award. The defendant incorrectly claimed the issue of fees was not raised and that they were aggrieved by the award. The Board found the defendant was not aggrieved, as fees were payable from the applicant's benefits, and the issue was properly noted in the pre-trial statement. Consequently, the Board issued a notice of intention to impose sanctions on the defendant's counsel for filing a frivolous petition.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.