Home/Case Law/PAMELA POURE vs. AMADA ENGINEERING & SERVICE, CALIFORNIA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

PAMELA POURE vs. AMADA ENGINEERING & SERVICE, CALIFORNIA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Nov 05, 2008
San Francisco
ADJ177164 (LBO 0336347), ADJ1295838 (LBO 0284341), ADJ3487408 (LBO 0379962), ADJ309876 (LBO 0265687)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to address the defendant's claim that the trial judge erred in determining the date of cumulative trauma without sufficient evidence on when the applicant knew or should have known her disability was work-related. The Board found merit in the defendant's argument that crucial evidence regarding the applicant's knowledge and the precise date of injury under Labor Code sections 5412 and 5500.5 is missing. Therefore, the case is returned to the trial level for further development of the record and a new decision.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to address the defendant's claim that the trial judge erred in determining the date of cumulative trauma without sufficient evidence on when the applicant knew or should have known her disability was work-related. The Board found merit in the defendant's argument that crucial evidence regarding the applicant's knowledge and the precise date of injury under Labor Code sections 5412 and 5500.5 is missing. Therefore, the case is returned to the trial level for further development of the record and a new decision.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

PAMELA POURE vs. AMADA ENGINEERING & SERVICE, CALIFORNIA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox