CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Pamela Moseley's petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, finding that while the decision addressed a threshold issue making it final for reconsideration purposes, Moseley's challenge focused only on interlocutory findings regarding deferred body parts. Since Moseley failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm from denying removal, and reconsideration was deemed an adequate remedy, the petition was denied. The Board also noted that stipulations from a prior settlement conference were not re-entered at trial, limiting the issues considered.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Pamela Moseley's petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, finding that while the decision addressed a threshold issue making it final for reconsideration purposes, Moseley's challenge focused only on interlocutory findings regarding deferred body parts. Since Moseley failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm from denying removal, and reconsideration was deemed an adequate remedy, the petition was denied. The Board also noted that stipulations from a prior settlement conference were not re-entered at trial, limiting the issues considered.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.