Home/Case Law/Owen v. Arcata Graphics/Kingsport Press
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Owen v. Arcata Graphics/Kingsport Press

Court of Appeals of Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Jayme Owen was injured when improperly stacked books in his employer's warehouse fell on him. The books were supplied by Areata Graphics using a 'glide pack' method, and stacked three high by Owen's employer, NBD. Owen, along with his wife Lynda, sued Areata Graphics, alleging negligence in the stacking and securing of the books. A jury awarded substantial damages to the Owens, which were later subject to a remittitur for Lynda Owen. Areata Graphics appealed, citing several errors including the trial court's failure to instruct the jury on the assumption of risk and the misconduct of a juror who concealed her extensive litigation history during voir dire. The appellate court found merit in both issues, reversed the trial court's decision, and remanded the case for a new trial.

Owen v. Arcata Graphics/Kingsport Press is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Jayme Owen was injured when improperly stacked books in his employer's warehouse fell on him. The books were supplied by Areata Graphics using a 'glide pack' method, and stacked three high by Owen's employer, NBD. Owen, along with his wife Lynda, sued Areata Graphics, alleging negligence in the stacking and securing of the books. A jury awarded substantial damages to the Owens, which were later subject to a remittitur for Lynda Owen. Areata Graphics appealed, citing several errors including the trial court's failure to instruct the jury on the assumption of risk and the misconduct of a juror who concealed her extensive litigation history during voir dire. The appellate court found merit in both issues, reversed the trial court's decision, and remanded the case for a new trial.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Owen v. Arcata Graphics/Kingsport Press workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Owen v. Arcata Graphics/Kingsport Press case law summary from Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Owen v. Arcata Graphics/Kingsport Press Case Analysis

Owen v. Arcata Graphics/Kingsport Press is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.