Home/Case Law/OTTOMA L. CURRY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

OTTOMA L. CURRY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Aug 05, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ4330842 (VNO 0331594) ADJ207082 (VNO 0314241) ADJ1775987 (VNO 0376271)

CompFox AI Summary

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision affirms a prior award finding the applicant sustained a 100% permanent disability due to cumulative trauma to her gastrointestinal system, hypertension, and fibromyalgia. The Board rejected the defendant's arguments regarding the substantiality of the Agreed Medical Examiner's opinions and the necessity of apportionment to a prior award for psychiatric injury. However, the Board amended the award to reflect the parties' stipulation of the applicant's average weekly earnings at $791.54, as initially determined by the WCJ. The lien claimant's petition was deemed moot as their claim was taken off calendar prior to the original hearing.

OTTOMA L. CURRY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision affirms a prior award finding the applicant sustained a 100% permanent disability due to cumulative trauma to her gastrointestinal system, hypertension, and fibromyalgia. The Board rejected the defendant's arguments regarding the substantiality of the Agreed Medical Examiner's opinions and the necessity of apportionment to a prior award for psychiatric injury. However, the Board amended the award to reflect the parties' stipulation of the applicant's average weekly earnings at $791.54, as initially determined by the WCJ. The lien claimant's petition was deemed moot as their claim was taken off calendar prior to the original hearing.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

OTTOMA L. CURRY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

OTTOMA L. CURRY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

OTTOMA L. CURRY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

OTTOMA L. CURRY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.