Home/Case Law/OSCAR RENDEROS vs. SEA BREEZE CONSTRUCTION, WESCO INSURANCE, AMTRUST FINANCIAL SERVICES
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

OSCAR RENDEROS vs. SEA BREEZE CONSTRUCTION, WESCO INSURANCE, AMTRUST FINANCIAL SERVICES

Filed: Jul 10, 2018
Santa Ana
ADJ10962119; ADJ11023301

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant's claim was not barred by the statute of limitations. The Board deferred to the Administrative Law Judge's (WCJ) credibility determination, finding no substantial evidence to reject it. The employer's letter stating they would "administratively close" the file was not deemed a denial of the claim, thus not triggering the statute of limitations. The WCJ found the employer failed to adequately inform the applicant of his rights after receiving the DWC-1 form.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant's claim was not barred by the statute of limitations. The Board deferred to the Administrative Law Judge's (WCJ) credibility determination, finding no substantial evidence to reject it. The employer's letter stating they would "administratively close" the file was not deemed a denial of the claim, thus not triggering the statute of limitations. The WCJ found the employer failed to adequately inform the applicant of his rights after receiving the DWC-1 form.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

OSCAR RENDEROS vs. SEA BREEZE CONSTRUCTION, WESCO INSURANCE, AMTRUST FINANCIAL SERVICES (2018) – Santa Ana | CompFox