Home/Case Law/ORVILLE BURDINE vs. HARRIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, SEDGWICK CIGA GLENDALE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ORVILLE BURDINE vs. HARRIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, SEDGWICK CIGA GLENDALE

Filed: Aug 15, 2013
Long Beach
ADJ7047773

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the WCJ's credibility finding for the applicant, noting the defendant failed to properly present deposition testimony or establish due diligence for unavailable medical records. While concurring in the denial, a dissenting commissioner suggested issuing sanctions against the defendant's counsel for multiple procedural violations in their petition.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the WCJ's credibility finding for the applicant, noting the defendant failed to properly present deposition testimony or establish due diligence for unavailable medical records. While concurring in the denial, a dissenting commissioner suggested issuing sanctions against the defendant's counsel for multiple procedural violations in their petition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ORVILLE BURDINE vs. HARRIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, SEDGWICK CIGA GLENDALE (2013) – Long Beach | CompFox