Home/Case Law/ONISSA DAVIS vs. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ONISSA DAVIS vs. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: May 30, 2019
Los Angeles
ADJ10887940

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to amend a previous decision. The Board found that the "going and coming rule" does not bar the applicant's claim. However, the issue of whether the injury arose out of and occurred in the course of employment (AOE/COE) was not litigated at trial. Therefore, the Board deferred the AOE/COE issue, allowing parties to proceed with it later if ready.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to amend a previous decision. The Board found that the "going and coming rule" does not bar the applicant's claim. However, the issue of whether the injury arose out of and occurred in the course of employment (AOE/COE) was not litigated at trial. Therefore, the Board deferred the AOE/COE issue, allowing parties to proceed with it later if ready.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ONISSA DAVIS vs. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES (2019) – Los Angeles | CompFox