CompFox AI Summary
This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case involved a petition for reconsideration filed by U.S. Xpress Enterprises and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. The defendants argued that the medical report relied upon by the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) was not substantial evidence, specifically regarding the timing of the employee's death from a pulmonary embolus. The Board denied the petition, adopting the WCJ's report which found the physician's opinion to be substantial medical evidence based on adequate examination and reasoning. The Board concluded the WCJ properly found this opinion more persuasive than the opposing medical opinion.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case involved a petition for reconsideration filed by U.S. Xpress Enterprises and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. The defendants argued that the medical report relied upon by the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) was not substantial evidence, specifically regarding the timing of the employee's death from a pulmonary embolus. The Board denied the petition, adopting the WCJ's report which found the physician's opinion to be substantial medical evidence based on adequate examination and reasoning. The Board concluded the WCJ properly found this opinion more persuasive than the opposing medical opinion.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.