Home/Case Law/OKHARINA HOLMES vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CSP <br> SACRAMENTO, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency
Regular DecisionReconsideration

OKHARINA HOLMES vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CSP <br> SACRAMENTO, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency

Filed: Aug 09, 2019
Sacramento
ADJ8912553

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a worker seeking compensation for a psychiatric injury allegedly sustained on October 25, 2012. The administrative law judge initially found in favor of the applicant, awarding temporary disability and attorney's fees. The defendant sought reconsideration, arguing the psychiatric injury was not proven, was barred by a good faith personnel action defense, and that attorney's fees could not be deducted from industrial disability leave. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration but affirmed the original findings, except it deferred the determination of temporary disability indemnity and the applicant's attorney's fees.

OKHARINA HOLMES vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CSP <br> SACRAMENTO, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency is a workers' compensation case decided in Sacramento. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Sacramento.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a worker seeking compensation for a psychiatric injury allegedly sustained on October 25, 2012. The administrative law judge initially found in favor of the applicant, awarding temporary disability and attorney's fees. The defendant sought reconsideration, arguing the psychiatric injury was not proven, was barred by a good faith personnel action defense, and that attorney's fees could not be deducted from industrial disability leave. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration but affirmed the original findings, except it deferred the determination of temporary disability indemnity and the applicant's attorney's fees.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

OKHARINA HOLMES vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CSP <br> SACRAMENTO, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency workers compensation case in Sacramento. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

OKHARINA HOLMES vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CSP <br> SACRAMENTO, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency case law summary from Sacramento. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

OKHARINA HOLMES vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CSP <br> SACRAMENTO, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency Case Analysis

OKHARINA HOLMES vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CSP <br> SACRAMENTO, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES, Adjusting Agency is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Sacramento. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.