Home/Case Law/OCTAVIO MELGOZA vs. TAYLOR FARMS, ZURICH INSURANCE ET AL.
Regular Decision

OCTAVIO MELGOZA vs. TAYLOR FARMS, ZURICH INSURANCE ET AL.

Filed: Apr 17, 2003
San Francisco
ADJ2860126 (SAL 0109997)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order that determined substantive rights or liabilities. Furthermore, the petition's request for removal was denied because the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The WCAB adopted the Workers' Compensation Judge's report and recommendation regarding removal. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration is dismissed, and removal is denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order that determined substantive rights or liabilities. Furthermore, the petition's request for removal was denied because the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The WCAB adopted the Workers' Compensation Judge's report and recommendation regarding removal. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration is dismissed, and removal is denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

OCTAVIO MELGOZA vs. TAYLOR FARMS, ZURICH INSURANCE ET AL. (2003) – San Francisco | CompFox