Home/Case Law/Oaks v. Olympic Stain Co.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Oaks v. Olympic Stain Co.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves an application for the apportionment of attorneys' fees between the counsel for an injured workman and his employer, as per the Tennessee Workmen’s Compensation Act. The workman secured a $100,000 judgment from a third party, which included a $22,108.29 subrogation lien for the employer. Both the workman and the employer (represented by its compensation carrier, Fireman’s Fund American Insurance Companies) had retained separate counsel. The core dispute was whether the workman's counsel was entitled to a reasonable fee from the portion of the judgment subject to the employer's lien. The Court, interpreting T.C.A. § 50-914, ruled that a reasonable fee should be determined and then apportioned based on the services rendered. Ultimately, the Court held that the workman's counsel, L. B. Bolt, Jr. and James F. Pryor, were entitled to $3,684.71, while the employer's counsel, Robert Campbell, was entitled to his contractual fee from Fireman’s Fund.

Oaks v. Olympic Stain Co. is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, E.D. Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves an application for the apportionment of attorneys' fees between the counsel for an injured workman and his employer, as per the Tennessee Workmen’s Compensation Act. The workman secured a $100,000 judgment from a third party, which included a $22,108.29 subrogation lien for the employer. Both the workman and the employer (represented by its compensation carrier, Fireman’s Fund American Insurance Companies) had retained separate counsel. The core dispute was whether the workman's counsel was entitled to a reasonable fee from the portion of the judgment subject to the employer's lien. The Court, interpreting T.C.A. § 50-914, ruled that a reasonable fee should be determined and then apportioned based on the services rendered. Ultimately, the Court held that the workman's counsel, L. B. Bolt, Jr. and James F. Pryor, were entitled to $3,684.71, while the employer's counsel, Robert Campbell, was entitled to his contractual fee from Fireman’s Fund.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Oaks v. Olympic Stain Co. workers compensation case in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Oaks v. Olympic Stain Co. case law summary from District Court, E.D. Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Oaks v. Olympic Stain Co. Case Analysis

Oaks v. Olympic Stain Co. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.