CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board denied Norman Silva's Petition for Reconsideration because the underlying WCJ decision resolved threshold issues like employment and injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment, making it a final order. Petitioner's challenge focused solely on the administrative issue of the QME selection, not the merits of the final findings. The Board found no grounds for removal, as petitioner failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm from the QME issue, nor was there evidence of ex parte communication. Consequently, the petition was denied, and the WCJ's decision stands.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board denied Norman Silva's Petition for Reconsideration because the underlying WCJ decision resolved threshold issues like employment and injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment, making it a final order. Petitioner's challenge focused solely on the administrative issue of the QME selection, not the merits of the final findings. The Board found no grounds for removal, as petitioner failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm from the QME issue, nor was there evidence of ex parte communication. Consequently, the petition was denied, and the WCJ's decision stands.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.