Home/Case Law/NORMA NERI vs. KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE, SEDGWICK CMS/SRS
Regular DecisionReconsideration

NORMA NERI vs. KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE, SEDGWICK CMS/SRS

Filed: Sep 12, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ7157224

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves Norma Neri's pro per petition for reconsideration of an approved Compromise and Release agreement. Her petition was dismissed by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board because it was unverified, unsigned, and failed to state the grounds for reconsideration. The Board noted that Labor Code section 5902 requires verification of such petitions and that applicant had not cured this defect despite notice. Therefore, the Board found good cause to dismiss the petition.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves Norma Neri's pro per petition for reconsideration of an approved Compromise and Release agreement. Her petition was dismissed by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board because it was unverified, unsigned, and failed to state the grounds for reconsideration. The Board noted that Labor Code section 5902 requires verification of such petitions and that applicant had not cured this defect despite notice. Therefore, the Board found good cause to dismiss the petition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

NORMA NERI vs. KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE, SEDGWICK CMS/SRS (2011) – San Francisco | CompFox