CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a finding that an applicant sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of employment. The applicant was injured in a car accident while en route to pick up her supervisor to travel to a client meeting. The Board found that the going and coming rule did not bar recovery as the applicant was engaged in a special mission for her employer. This mission involved an extraordinary deviation from her routine commute, specifically at the employer's benefit and request.
Nicolle Rowe vs. Road Dog Drivers, LLC, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania is a workers' compensation case decided in Sacramento. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Sacramento.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a finding that an applicant sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of employment. The applicant was injured in a car accident while en route to pick up her supervisor to travel to a client meeting. The Board found that the "going and coming" rule did not bar recovery as the applicant was engaged in a "special mission" for her employer. This mission involved an extraordinary deviation from her routine commute, specifically at the employer's benefit and request.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.