Home/Case Law/Nicholas Ramos vs. ANITA ZARAGOZA, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Nicholas Ramos vs. ANITA ZARAGOZA, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT

Filed: Jun 06, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ4106399 (SAL 0115982)

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and affirmed the decision that the defendant did not meet its burden to establish that the applicant earned less than $100.00 and worked less than 52 hours in the 90 days before the injury.

Nicholas Ramos vs. ANITA ZARAGOZA, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and affirmed the decision that the defendant did not meet its burden to establish that the applicant earned less than $100.00 and worked less than 52 hours in the 90 days before the injury.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Nicholas Ramos vs. ANITA ZARAGOZA, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Nicholas Ramos vs. ANITA ZARAGOZA, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Nicholas Ramos vs. ANITA ZARAGOZA, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT Case Analysis

Nicholas Ramos vs. ANITA ZARAGOZA, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.