CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board denied defendant's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board award. The defendant argued the applicant's treating physician's psychiatric reports lacked substantial evidence and that a QME's report was more accurate. The Board found that the treating physician's opinions, which were well-reasoned and considered the applicant's medical history, constituted substantial evidence. Therefore, the Board upheld the original award finding the applicant sustained injury to her spine, psyche, and gastrointestinal/sleep disorders, resulting in 81% permanent partial disability.
NEVENKA GLAVAN vs. KMART, SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION is a workers' compensation case decided in Van Nuys. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Van Nuys.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board denied defendant's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board award. The defendant argued the applicant's treating physician's psychiatric reports lacked substantial evidence and that a QME's report was more accurate. The Board found that the treating physician's opinions, which were well-reasoned and considered the applicant's medical history, constituted substantial evidence. Therefore, the Board upheld the original award finding the applicant sustained injury to her spine, psyche, and gastrointestinal/sleep disorders, resulting in 81% permanent partial disability.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.