Home/Case Law/NAVIN RAZO vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, Legally Uninsured, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

NAVIN RAZO vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, Legally Uninsured, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Dec 07, 2020
Van Nuys
ADJ11645837

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant temporarily totally disabled. The defendant argued that the medical reports relied upon were not substantial evidence. The Board adopted the judge's report, which found the opinions of Drs. Hannani and Levine to be substantial evidence based on reasonable medical probability. These doctors were new treating physicians who assessed the applicant as temporarily totally disabled and in need of further treatment.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant temporarily totally disabled. The defendant argued that the medical reports relied upon were not substantial evidence. The Board adopted the judge's report, which found the opinions of Drs. Hannani and Levine to be substantial evidence based on reasonable medical probability. These doctors were new treating physicians who assessed the applicant as temporarily totally disabled and in need of further treatment.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

NAVIN RAZO vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, Legally Uninsured, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (2020) – Van Nuys | CompFox