CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns a contribution dispute between two insurance carriers, TIG and Golden Eagle, for a cumulative trauma injury claim. Golden Eagle sought reconsideration of an order compelling it to pay over $$101,000$ in contribution to TIG. Golden Eagle argued it was never properly served with a notice of intention and that Labor Code section 5275 mandates arbitration for contribution disputes. The Appeals Board agreed that mandatory arbitration applies, rescinded the order, and remanded the case for either informal resolution or arbitration.
MYRNA PEREZ vs. FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, TIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO., REM, LTD, GOLDEN EAGLE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns a contribution dispute between two insurance carriers, TIG and Golden Eagle, for a cumulative trauma injury claim. Golden Eagle sought reconsideration of an order compelling it to pay over $$101,000$ in contribution to TIG. Golden Eagle argued it was never properly served with a notice of intention and that Labor Code section 5275 mandates arbitration for contribution disputes. The Appeals Board agreed that mandatory arbitration applies, rescinded the order, and remanded the case for either informal resolution or arbitration.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.