Home/Case Law/MYLINH WHITMAN vs. CINGULAR WIRELESS, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MYLINH WHITMAN vs. CINGULAR WIRELESS, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT

Filed: Sep 24, 2007
AHM 98231

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board is reconsidering whether the defendant, Cingular Wireless, is entitled to a credit for salary continuation benefits paid to the applicant. The key issue is whether these benefits were of the "same general character" as workers' compensation, which would permit integration and a credit. The case is returned to the trial level for further evidence development on this specific point, rescinding the prior award of a credit.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board is reconsidering whether the defendant, Cingular Wireless, is entitled to a credit for salary continuation benefits paid to the applicant. The key issue is whether these benefits were of the "same general character" as workers' compensation, which would permit integration and a credit. The case is returned to the trial level for further evidence development on this specific point, rescinding the prior award of a credit.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MYLINH WHITMAN vs. CINGULAR WIRELESS, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT (2007) – | CompFox