Home/Case Law/MOEGAGOGO TAMASESE vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO JUVENILE PROBATION DEPARTMENT, INTERCARE
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

MOEGAGOGO TAMASESE vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO JUVENILE PROBATION DEPARTMENT, INTERCARE

Filed: Aug 02, 2017
San Francisco
ADJ8030860, ADJ8179533, ADJ8179544

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration. The denial was based on the WCAB adopting the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ). Specifically, the Defendant violated WCAB Rule 10842(c) by attaching an Exhibit List to their petition, which contained documents already in evidence. The Board also noted this likely was an attempt to circumvent page limits and admonished the Defendant for non-compliance.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration. The denial was based on the WCAB adopting the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ). Specifically, the Defendant violated WCAB Rule 10842(c) by attaching an Exhibit List to their petition, which contained documents already in evidence. The Board also noted this likely was an attempt to circumvent page limits and admonished the Defendant for non-compliance.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MOEGAGOGO TAMASESE vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO JUVENILE PROBATION DEPARTMENT, INTERCARE (2017) – San Francisco | CompFox