Home/Case Law/MINA MESIC vs. HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION (HILTON SAN FRANCISCO & TOWERS), ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY administered by SPECIALTY RISK PLEASANTON
Regular DecisionOpinion and Orders

MINA MESIC vs. HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION (HILTON SAN FRANCISCO & TOWERS), ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY administered by SPECIALTY RISK PLEASANTON

Filed: Aug 25, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ809466 (SFO 0476863), ADJ2555852 (OAK 0329065), ADJ3801383 (OAK 0329066)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a dispute over an Agreed Medical Evaluator's (AME) reports on applicant Mina Mesic's industrial injuries and permanent disability apportionment. The defendant, Hilton Hotels Corporation, sought a new AME, alleging the current AME's reports were inconsistent and failed to comply with Labor Code section 4663. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the petition for reconsideration, as the challenged order was not a final determination. The WCAB also denied the petition for removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, as the defendant could still challenge the AME's reports at trial. The WCJ's order merely denied the request for a new AME, allowing the current AME's reports to be weighed as evidence.

MINA MESIC vs. HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION (HILTON SAN FRANCISCO & TOWERS), ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY administered by SPECIALTY RISK PLEASANTON is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a dispute over an Agreed Medical Evaluator's (AME) reports on applicant Mina Mesic's industrial injuries and permanent disability apportionment. The defendant, Hilton Hotels Corporation, sought a new AME, alleging the current AME's reports were inconsistent and failed to comply with Labor Code section 4663. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the petition for reconsideration, as the challenged order was not a final determination. The WCAB also denied the petition for removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, as the defendant could still challenge the AME's reports at trial. The WCJ's order merely denied the request for a new AME, allowing the current AME's reports to be weighed as evidence.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MINA MESIC vs. HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION (HILTON SAN FRANCISCO & TOWERS), ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY administered by SPECIALTY RISK PLEASANTON workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MINA MESIC vs. HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION (HILTON SAN FRANCISCO & TOWERS), ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY administered by SPECIALTY RISK PLEASANTON case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MINA MESIC vs. HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION (HILTON SAN FRANCISCO & TOWERS), ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY administered by SPECIALTY RISK PLEASANTON Case Analysis

MINA MESIC vs. HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION (HILTON SAN FRANCISCO & TOWERS), ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY administered by SPECIALTY RISK PLEASANTON is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.