Home/Case Law/MIGUEL CERVANTES vs. PREMIER POOLS AND SPAS, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

MIGUEL CERVANTES vs. PREMIER POOLS AND SPAS, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE

Filed: Mar 12, 2013
San Francisco
ADJ8055778; ADJ8075417

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board denied Liberty Mutual's Petition for Removal, affirming the WCJ's order compelling production of documents via notice. Despite Liberty's argument that Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 discovery methods are invalid in workers' compensation, the Board found a notice to produce documents is permissible under WCAB Rule 10532 when served on a party. The matter was returned to the trial level for mandatory arbitration regarding insurance coverage, as required by Labor Code Section 5275(a).

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board denied Liberty Mutual's Petition for Removal, affirming the WCJ's order compelling production of documents via notice. Despite Liberty's argument that Code of Civil Procedure Section 2031 discovery methods are invalid in workers' compensation, the Board found a notice to produce documents is permissible under WCAB Rule 10532 when served on a party. The matter was returned to the trial level for mandatory arbitration regarding insurance coverage, as required by Labor Code Section 5275(a).

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MIGUEL CERVANTES vs. PREMIER POOLS AND SPAS, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE (2013) – San Francisco | CompFox