Home/Case Law/MIGUEL ANGEL GARCIA vs. INTERNATIONAL WINDOW, ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MIGUEL ANGEL GARCIA vs. INTERNATIONAL WINDOW, ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE

Filed: Aug 21, 2014
San Francisco
ADJ7464284

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior award finding that Miguel Angel Garcia sustained industrial injuries to his back, neck, shoulders, and arms from cumulative trauma and a specific incident while employed by International Window. The Board found Dr. Donohue's medical reports constituted substantial evidence supporting the cumulative trauma finding and ongoing temporary disability. The Board also ruled that Garcia was permitted to select a new primary treating physician for his cumulative trauma claim, as he had not been properly notified of his prior physician's final determination for the specific injury. The defendant's contentions regarding lack of medical evidence, ongoing temporary disability, and improper physician selection were rejected.

MIGUEL ANGEL GARCIA vs. INTERNATIONAL WINDOW, ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior award finding that Miguel Angel Garcia sustained industrial injuries to his back, neck, shoulders, and arms from cumulative trauma and a specific incident while employed by International Window. The Board found Dr. Donohue's medical reports constituted substantial evidence supporting the cumulative trauma finding and ongoing temporary disability. The Board also ruled that Garcia was permitted to select a new primary treating physician for his cumulative trauma claim, as he had not been properly notified of his prior physician's final determination for the specific injury. The defendant's contentions regarding lack of medical evidence, ongoing temporary disability, and improper physician selection were rejected.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MIGUEL ANGEL GARCIA vs. INTERNATIONAL WINDOW, ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MIGUEL ANGEL GARCIA vs. INTERNATIONAL WINDOW, ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MIGUEL ANGEL GARCIA vs. INTERNATIONAL WINDOW, ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE Case Analysis

MIGUEL ANGEL GARCIA vs. INTERNATIONAL WINDOW, ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.