Home/Case Law/MIGHAEL THAO vs. COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, SELECT PERSONNEL SERVICES, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED GROUP
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MIGHAEL THAO vs. COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, SELECT PERSONNEL SERVICES, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED GROUP

Filed: Dec 01, 2008
ADJ3387478 (SAC 0297421)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a workers' compensation claim where CIGA seeks reconsideration of a finding that its liability for an injured applicant's spine and head injury was not absolved by other insurance. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the previous findings, and returned the matter for further proceedings. The Board held that Coca Cola's Zurich insurance policy constituted other insurance as per Insurance Code § 1063.1(c)(9), thereby relieving CIGA of liability for the claim.

MIGHAEL THAO vs. COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, SELECT PERSONNEL SERVICES, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED GROUP is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a workers' compensation claim where CIGA seeks reconsideration of a finding that its liability for an injured applicant's spine and head injury was not absolved by other insurance. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the previous findings, and returned the matter for further proceedings. The Board held that Coca Cola's Zurich insurance policy constituted "other insurance" as per Insurance Code § 1063.1(c)(9), thereby relieving CIGA of liability for the claim.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MIGHAEL THAO vs. COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, SELECT PERSONNEL SERVICES, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED GROUP workers compensation case in . Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MIGHAEL THAO vs. COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, SELECT PERSONNEL SERVICES, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED GROUP case law summary from . Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MIGHAEL THAO vs. COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, SELECT PERSONNEL SERVICES, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED GROUP Case Analysis

MIGHAEL THAO vs. COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, SELECT PERSONNEL SERVICES, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED GROUP is a legal case related to workers' compensation in . This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.