CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, adopting the reasoning of the WCJ. Additionally, the Board admonished applicant's attorney, S. Roger Kampf, for using offensive, inappropriate, and disrespectful language in the petition, specifically accusations that the judge wrote her opinion as a defense attorney rather than an impartial judge. Mr. Kampf was also admonished for filing a pleading containing false or misleading statements of fact. Failure to comply with Board rules in the future may result in sanctions.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, adopting the reasoning of the WCJ. Additionally, the Board admonished applicant's attorney, S. Roger Kampf, for using offensive, inappropriate, and disrespectful language in the petition, specifically accusations that the judge wrote her opinion as a defense attorney rather than an impartial judge. Mr. Kampf was also admonished for filing a pleading containing false or misleading statements of fact. Failure to comply with Board rules in the future may result in sanctions.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.