Home/Case Law/MICHAEL PFUNDSTEIN vs. HENDRICKSON TRUCKING, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MICHAEL PFUNDSTEIN vs. HENDRICKSON TRUCKING, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

Filed: Jul 28, 2016
Stockton
ADJ9173604

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns Michael Pfundstein's cumulative wrist injury claim against Hendrickson Trucking. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the finding that the date of injury was October 3, 2013, based on the concurrence of disability and applicant's knowledge of its industrial origin. The Board found the defendant failed to prove the statute of limitations barred the claim, as the applicant's application was filed timely after the determined date of injury. Liability for the cumulative injury is linked to the period of exposure, which the medical evidence indicated was during the applicant's employment with the defendant.

MICHAEL PFUNDSTEIN vs. HENDRICKSON TRUCKING, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA is a workers' compensation case decided in Stockton. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Stockton.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns Michael Pfundstein's cumulative wrist injury claim against Hendrickson Trucking. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the finding that the date of injury was October 3, 2013, based on the concurrence of disability and applicant's knowledge of its industrial origin. The Board found the defendant failed to prove the statute of limitations barred the claim, as the applicant's application was filed timely after the determined date of injury. Liability for the cumulative injury is linked to the period of exposure, which the medical evidence indicated was during the applicant's employment with the defendant.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MICHAEL PFUNDSTEIN vs. HENDRICKSON TRUCKING, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA workers compensation case in Stockton. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MICHAEL PFUNDSTEIN vs. HENDRICKSON TRUCKING, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA case law summary from Stockton. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MICHAEL PFUNDSTEIN vs. HENDRICKSON TRUCKING, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA Case Analysis

MICHAEL PFUNDSTEIN vs. HENDRICKSON TRUCKING, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Stockton. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.