Home/Case Law/MICHAEL PERRY vs. S2 HR SOLUTIONS 1 D, LLC, BALANCE ENERGY, LLC, SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, INC., COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, HELSMAN MANAGEMENT SER
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

MICHAEL PERRY vs. S2 HR SOLUTIONS 1 D, LLC, BALANCE ENERGY, LLC, SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, INC., COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, HELSMAN MANAGEMENT SER

Filed: Sep 13, 2022
Van Nuys
ADJ11075823 (MF); ADJ11130118; ADJ11703310

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied Michael Perry's petitions for reconsideration, removal, and disqualification. The WCAB adopted the reasoning of the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) who found the petitions lacked merit. Specifically, Perry's claims regarding the exclusion of evidence, reinstatement of a prior Labor Code section 132a petition, and disqualification of the WCJ were denied. The Board found the WCJ's rulings were based on proper legal grounds and that Perry failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm.

MICHAEL PERRY vs. S2 HR SOLUTIONS 1 D, LLC, BALANCE ENERGY, LLC, SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, INC., COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, HELSMAN MANAGEMENT SER is a workers' compensation case decided in Van Nuys. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Van Nuys.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied Michael Perry's petitions for reconsideration, removal, and disqualification. The WCAB adopted the reasoning of the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) who found the petitions lacked merit. Specifically, Perry's claims regarding the exclusion of evidence, reinstatement of a prior Labor Code section 132a petition, and disqualification of the WCJ were denied. The Board found the WCJ's rulings were based on proper legal grounds and that Perry failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MICHAEL PERRY vs. S2 HR SOLUTIONS 1 D, LLC, BALANCE ENERGY, LLC, SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, INC., COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, HELSMAN MANAGEMENT SER workers compensation case in Van Nuys. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MICHAEL PERRY vs. S2 HR SOLUTIONS 1 D, LLC, BALANCE ENERGY, LLC, SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, INC., COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, HELSMAN MANAGEMENT SER case law summary from Van Nuys. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MICHAEL PERRY vs. S2 HR SOLUTIONS 1 D, LLC, BALANCE ENERGY, LLC, SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, INC., COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, HELSMAN MANAGEMENT SER Case Analysis

MICHAEL PERRY vs. S2 HR SOLUTIONS 1 D, LLC, BALANCE ENERGY, LLC, SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, INC., COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, HELSMAN MANAGEMENT SER is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Van Nuys. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.