CompFox AI Summary
In Mendoza v. Kelly Services, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the employer's petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the administrative law judge's finding that the applicant's injury, sustained while walking from an employer-assigned parking lot to the worksite, was not barred by the going and coming rule. The applicant was injured crossing a freeway on-ramp when a truck struck him. The Board reasoned that the applicant had already entered the employer's premises and the employment relationship had commenced when he was injured.
MICHAEL MENDOZA vs. KELLY SERVICES, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE c/o ESIS is a workers' compensation case decided in Pomona. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Pomona.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In Mendoza v. Kelly Services, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the employer's petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the administrative law judge's finding that the applicant's injury, sustained while walking from an employer-assigned parking lot to the worksite, was not barred by the going and coming rule. The applicant was injured crossing a freeway on-ramp when a truck struck him. The Board reasoned that the applicant had already entered the employer's premises and the employment relationship had commenced when he was injured.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.