Home/Case Law/MICHAEL MCKENNA vs. CITY OF SACRAMENTO
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MICHAEL MCKENNA vs. CITY OF SACRAMENTO

Filed: Jun 01, 2015
Sacramento
ADJ9348178

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration because the challenged order was not a final determination. However, the Board granted removal, rescinded the order disqualifying defense counsel, and remanded the case for further proceedings. This action was taken because the original disqualification was issued without an evidentiary record and lacked proper legal analysis under the relevant case law. The Workers' Compensation Judge must now create a record and apply established precedent, like Kirk v. First American Title Ins. Co., to the disqualification issue.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration because the challenged order was not a final determination. However, the Board granted removal, rescinded the order disqualifying defense counsel, and remanded the case for further proceedings. This action was taken because the original disqualification was issued without an evidentiary record and lacked proper legal analysis under the relevant case law. The Workers' Compensation Judge must now create a record and apply established precedent, like Kirk v. First American Title Ins. Co., to the disqualification issue.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MICHAEL MCKENNA vs. CITY OF SACRAMENTO (2015) – Sacramento | CompFox