Home/Case Law/MICHAEL LINSCOTT vs. ALL TECH MACHINE ENGINEERING, INC., AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MICHAEL LINSCOTT vs. ALL TECH MACHINE ENGINEERING, INC., AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA

Filed: Nov 03, 2014
San Jose
ADJ9409445

CompFox AI Summary

Here's a summary of the case in four sentences for a lawyer:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Applicant Michael Linscott's Petition for Reconsideration and Removal. The Board found that reconsideration is not appropriate for a discovery order and the petition lacked required verification. The underlying issue involved a dispute over the specialty of a Qualified Medical Examiner panel requested by both parties. The Administrative Law Judge's report, adopted by the Board, found no evidence of procedural error by the Medical Unit in issuing the panel.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Here's a summary of the case in four sentences for a lawyer:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Applicant Michael Linscott's Petition for Reconsideration and Removal. The Board found that reconsideration is not appropriate for a discovery order and the petition lacked required verification. The underlying issue involved a dispute over the specialty of a Qualified Medical Examiner panel requested by both parties. The Administrative Law Judge's report, adopted by the Board, found no evidence of procedural error by the Medical Unit in issuing the panel.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.