CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns an appeal regarding the applicant's permanent disability rating for upper extremity injury. The defendants contended that the original $24%$ rating was improperly calculated, specifically challenging the inclusion of grip loss as a factor. The Appeals Board found the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinion on grip loss to be speculative and not substantial evidence under the Almaraz II decision. Consequently, the Board granted reconsideration, amended the award to $16%$ permanent disability, and affirmed the remainder of the original findings.
MICHAEL KESTEL vs. CAPITOL BUICK PONTIAC GMC, ZENITH, REPUBLIC INDEMNITY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns an appeal regarding the applicant's permanent disability rating for upper extremity injury. The defendants contended that the original $24%$ rating was improperly calculated, specifically challenging the inclusion of grip loss as a factor. The Appeals Board found the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinion on grip loss to be speculative and not substantial evidence under the Almaraz II decision. Consequently, the Board granted reconsideration, amended the award to $16%$ permanent disability, and affirmed the remainder of the original findings.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.