Home/Case Law/MICHAEL KATZ vs. CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

MICHAEL KATZ vs. CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP

Filed: Jan 28, 2015
Bakersfield
ADJ8433569

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the Applicant's petition for reconsideration. This dismissal was based on the principle that reconsideration can only be sought for final orders, not interlocutory procedural rulings. The WCAB clarified that pre-trial orders concerning evidence, discovery, trial scheduling, or venue are considered interlocutory and do not determine substantive rights. Therefore, the petition was dismissed as it was not filed in response to a final, appealable decision.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the Applicant's petition for reconsideration. This dismissal was based on the principle that reconsideration can only be sought for final orders, not interlocutory procedural rulings. The WCAB clarified that pre-trial orders concerning evidence, discovery, trial scheduling, or venue are considered interlocutory and do not determine substantive rights. Therefore, the petition was dismissed as it was not filed in response to a final, appealable decision.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MICHAEL KATZ vs. CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP (2015) – Bakersfield | CompFox