CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration of an Amended Order Approving Compromise and Release. The applicant alleged the settlement was procured by fraud, claiming he was intimidated and forced to sign without reviewing it. However, the Board found no evidence or testimony under oath was presented to support these allegations. Consequently, the Board recommended the petition be treated as a request to set aside the order, requiring a hearing for the applicant to present evidence.
MICHAEL GUILLOT vs. ALBERTSONS SUPERVALUE is a workers' compensation case decided in Long Beach. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Long Beach.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration of an Amended Order Approving Compromise and Release. The applicant alleged the settlement was procured by fraud, claiming he was intimidated and forced to sign without reviewing it. However, the Board found no evidence or testimony under oath was presented to support these allegations. Consequently, the Board recommended the petition be treated as a request to set aside the order, requiring a hearing for the applicant to present evidence.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.