Home/Case Law/MICHAEL GOMEZ vs. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE CONTRACT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MICHAEL GOMEZ vs. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE CONTRACT SERVICES

Filed: Dec 29, 2020
Riverside
ADJ12288761

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration, upholding a finding of 62% permanent disability for a correctional officer with cumulative trauma. The core issue was whether Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH), found by a QME, constituted heart trouble under Labor Code section 3212.2, triggering a presumption of industrial injury. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, relying on prior case law and expert medical opinions that LVH, even if minor, qualifies as heart trouble for purposes of the presumption. Defendant's arguments that LVH was not heart trouble and that medical opinions were contradicted were rejected as insufficient to rebut the presumption.

MICHAEL GOMEZ vs. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE CONTRACT SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in Riverside. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Riverside.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration, upholding a finding of 62% permanent disability for a correctional officer with cumulative trauma. The core issue was whether Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH), found by a QME, constituted "heart trouble" under Labor Code section 3212.2, triggering a presumption of industrial injury. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, relying on prior case law and expert medical opinions that LVH, even if minor, qualifies as "heart trouble" for purposes of the presumption. Defendant's arguments that LVH was not "heart trouble" and that medical opinions were contradicted were rejected as insufficient to rebut the presumption.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MICHAEL GOMEZ vs. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE CONTRACT SERVICES workers compensation case in Riverside. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MICHAEL GOMEZ vs. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE CONTRACT SERVICES case law summary from Riverside. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MICHAEL GOMEZ vs. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE CONTRACT SERVICES Case Analysis

MICHAEL GOMEZ vs. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE CONTRACT SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Riverside. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.